Entries in obama (8)

Thursday
11Sep2008

CBS pulls "lipstick" ad, Fox News cries wolf

This little "fair and balanced" gem come to us via Fox News (a.k.a The White House News Network):
CBS News has jumped into the middle of the presidential race, forcing YouTube to take down a Web ad by John McCain’s campaign that the network calls “misleading” in its use of Katie Couric. The McCain campaign is still featuring the ad prominently on its Web site and copycats have been uploaded onto YouTube by other users. The Illinois senator used the The Illinois Senator used the lipstick on a pig analogy...while describing his Republican opponents policies. lipstick on a pig analogy at a campaign event in Lebanon, Va., on Tuesday while describing his Republican opponents. CBS News Forces YouTube to Pull McCain ‘Lipstick’ Ad - America’s Election HQ.
To begin with the CBS Corporation (formerly Viacom) is against any of it's content being used on YouTube, regardless of the group presenting it.  Second, the ad presents statements made by a CBS employee (Katie Couric) completely outside of the context in which they were made.  Third, the McCain/Palin campaign violated copyright laws. Fox News claiming that CBS "jumped into the middle of the Presidential race" is a false assertion, the McCain/Palin campaign pulled them in when they infringed CBS copyright. I'm sure in the eyes of the WHNN this move is simply another ploy of the liberal media to prevent the convervative's from getting their message out.  Well, it's not. Of course, this is completely overlooking the fact that the ad itself is based solely on a manufactured slight of Sarah Palin.  I don't think anyone in their right mind would actually think Obama was calling Sarah Palin a pig (especially since Obama himself stated last night on Letterman that if anything 'had I meant it this way — she would be the lipstick” and McCain’s policies would be the pig, [Obama] said.'
Thursday
04Sep2008

Obama to prosecute Bush if elected?

“If there has been a basis upon which you can pursue someone for a criminal violation, they will be pursued,” Biden said during a campaign stop in Florida on Monday, ABC News reported. “Not out of vengeance, not out of retribution. Out of the need to preserve the notion that no one, no attorney general, no president — no one is above the law.” Biden promised that an Obama-Biden government would go through Bush administration data with "a fine-toothed comb" and pursue criminal charges if necessary. Newsmax.com – Obama May Bring Criminal Charges Against Bush.
Maybe it's me, but doesn't this just seem like a bad thing to bring up at a time when your overwhelming lead has become less than overwhelming? I really don't see how this helps the Obama/Biden ticket cosy up to moderate voters. Don't get me wrong, I am all for prosecuting those who break laws, especially at an executive level, but this just doesn't seem like anything more than posturing. Plus, this isn't what they should be focusing on this close to the election, they should be focusing on sharpening their message as we rapidly approach November, this just murkies the already muddy water of this election.
Tuesday
22Jul2008

Blaming Obama for high gas prices

The McCain campaign is lagging behind the Obama campaign in national opinion polls in many subjects, most recently polls that show the American public believes Obama is better prepared to deal with the energy crisis than Senator McCain. So, like the good little neo-con he has spent the last eight years becoming, Senator McCain has resorted to making bombastic, misleading claims. In his latest campaign commercial he has basically said that Barack Obama is the reason for high gas prices:
Now, as I am an independent, I don't have a horse in this race (although I will not be voting for McCain, that's for sure). However, I hate negative political tactics and more importantly, I hate it when politicians lie to the American public in an attempt to stir up fervor for their own campaign. And while McCain may be right that Obama doesn't support offshore drilling (or drilling in the ANWR, which McCain also opposes), but to claim that Obama's stance on off-shore drilling on the continental shelf equates to high gas prices is ludicrous. Point of fact, Senator Obama has proposed over $150 billion in spending over 10 years for the development of bio-fuels, plug-in hybrids, low-emission ["clean"] coal plants and the rapid development of other new, clean energy technologies (including nuclear power, as long as it's "safe"). Factcheck.org did a nice little examination of an RNC ad about Senator Obama's energy policy a few weeks back that applies well to this commercial as well. This is an important issue in the upcoming election, and a recent conversation that I had with my father really got me thinking about the way the campaigns are handling the truth. In today's society people are overly influenced by 30-60 second snippets of often misleading information, especially when it comes to politics. Only a small percentage of voters actually take the time to get accurate information and make educated decisions, and that is the biggest problem we face at this time, uneducated voters casting votes based on lies, spin and emotion rather than fact and logic. The real question we should all be asking ourselves is what we can do to change this? How do we educate a society that is more interested in Britney Spear's life than in the future of their government? I wish I had the answer to that question, I think we'd all be better off if people actually knew what they were voting for instead of picking their favorite tv commercial for President. Sasquatch in '08.