Tuesday
30Sep2008

And out come the wolves...

When Fareed Zakaria, Kathleen Parker and George Will say it's time to go, it's probably time to go:
Zakaria: "I greatly admire John McCain, a man of intelligence, honor and enormous personal and political courage. However, for him to choose Sara Palin to be his running mate is fundamentally irresponsible. He did not put the country first with this decision." Zakaria: McCain's VP decision is 'fundamentally irresponsible' - CNN.com. Parker: "Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League." Palin Problem: Kathleen Parker on National Review Online Will: "By picking Palin, McCain got the country's attention. That is a perishable thing and before it dissipates, he should show the country his veto pen." George Will::Townhall.com::The Palin Bubble
To be honest, I thought this was a strange selection from the get go, figuring McCain would play it safe and pick someone that he felt he could trust, or at least would add significant credentials to his campaign. Palin is most assuredly trustworthy (at least in that she is locked into McCain's message) but she doesn't add anything to his campaign, aside from the evangelical vote (but Mike Huckabee would have helped there as well). What I find interesting is that there is a possibility that both tickets could change before election day.  With rumours circulating about Joe Biden stepping down after the debate on 10/3 and pressure being put on McCain to drop Palin, could we still see an Obama/Clinton vs. McCain/Huckabee ro Romney or Giuliani ticket? I'm actually looking forward to the VP debate, if for no other reason than to see what kind of ammo Biden and Palin give to the SNL writers.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Wednesday
17Sep2008

The real problem with American Politics

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="169" caption="Image via Wikipedia"]A fasces appears on either side of the America...[/caption]
In a word, Congress. Congress is the biggest problem in our political system at present. Congress's average approval rating since January of this year is 28% (44% is the highest and 13% is the lowest). In contrast, President Bush's approval rating over the same period averaged 30% (with a high of 36% and a low of 19%). Now I know what you're thinking, these numbers look pretty similar, and you're right they do. However, we must remember that in the 2006 midterm election the Democrats took control of both houses of Congress on a platform of change (which has become a strong theme for both Presidential candidates). The 2006 election was an historic election (complete Congressional control has only changed 3 other times since we began directly electing Senators in the early 20th century). The people of the United States voted strongly to end the "Republican Revolution", and what has it gotten us? Well, aside from a minimum wage hike, nothing. The incumbency re-election rate for the House of Representatives (since 1962) is 92.86%, the Senate (since 1964) is 81.54%. In the historic 2006 election, 94% of incumbents we re-elected to the House, along with 79% of their colleagues in the Senate. Don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of President Bush, I can certianly be counted among the 64% of Americans who do not approve of the job he is doing (or has done) as President. However, the problem is far more systemic than the inhabitant of 1600 Pensylvania Ave. The problem with Washington is systemic, add to that the Presidential candidates manage to convince the voters every 4-8 years that things will change, they never really do. We are going to have a new president, that is certain, but what no one is paying attention to are the Senators and Representatives who serve us is Congress. I don't know about anyone else, but I can't even recall seeing a political ad for the Congressional elections in my district, everything is Obama/McCain. The Congress is probably the most important branch in our government, and yet has the lowest turnover rate (hell some Supreme Court Justices, who are appointed for life serve shorter terms than some Senators/Representatives.) This election has centered around the theme of "Change". Obama claimed it, McCain has taken it over as of late and come November 5th, only one thing will most likely have changed. Either Senator McCain or Senator Obama will cease to be a Senator and will become President-Elect, while the loser will return to the Senate and prepare for his inevitable re-election in 2010. The real question is what the American people plan to do about this? Unfortunately the answer to that question is nothing. Voter turnout hasn't been over 60% since 1988, and while I think we will see over 60% turnout in 2008, my guess is that a healthy majority of those voters are under-informed and will vote straight-party tickets or vote based solely on their emotional reactions to specific candidates. We need to take back the political system in this country, and we need to do that by sending a message to Washington at the ballot box, by sending incumbents home and making sure that politicis ceases to be a career and returns to being a service. Personally, I have decided to not vote for any candidate that has served more than two full terms, regardless of party affiliation (hell, neither party represents me anyways, and independent/third-party candidates have no chance at being elected in our system). Who's with me?
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Tuesday
16Sep2008

Push Polling Makes a Comeback

This report from Politico.com may be the first true "push-polling" i've heard about during this election cycle.
Jewish voters are complaining of a poll that, after confirming their religion, asks a series of questions that appear aimed at alarming Jewish voters, including linking Barack Obama to Palestinian terrorist groups. The New Republic's Jonathan Cohn, who took notes, and lists the negative messages:
  • Obama has had a decade long relationship with pro-Palestinian leaders in Chicago
  • The leader of Hamas, Ahmed Yousef, expressed support for Obama and his hope for Obama's victory
  • The church Barack Obama has attended is known for its anti-Israel and anti-American remarks
  • Jimmy Carter's anti-Israel national security advisor is one of Barack Obama's foreign policy advisors
  • Barack Obama was the member of a board (sic) that funded a pro-Palestinian chartiable organization
  • Barack Obama called for holding a summit of Muslim nations exlcuding Israel if elected president
Ben Smith's Blog: Jewish voters complain of anti-Obama poll - Politico.com.
Those who have received these calls claim that they are being conducted by "Research Strategies". The McCain campaign will obviously disavow any knowledge of these polls, even if the first result in a google search for "research strategies polling" is:

Wilson Research Strategies| Home

Opinion research firm serving Republican candidates, conservative organizations, public affairs campaigns, and major corporations. www.w-r-s.com/ - 19k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
Perhaps that's all a little too convenient, but it doesn't bode well.  I would have hoped that this distasteful method of campaigning would not have been seen in an election featuring the man it has most prominently been used against, John McCain. I honestly hope for McCain's sake that this is being done by some rogue 529, but given the way this campaign has been going, it seems like both sides are more than willing to pull out the stops, go negative and play fast and loose with the facts to get to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. as a temporary resident.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 Next 3 Entries »